Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Age, maturity, and plyometric training

I do not deal with a lot of children in my business, however, the book Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning offers great insight into the physical development of children (Baechle & Earle, 2008 pp. 142-150, 422). Without getting into specifics or the tests involved, it is known that all children do not grow or mature at the same rate however, the degree of physical maturity is related to fitness strengths. Although there is no evidence that physical training interferes with growth, as a child matures into adolescents the training programs may need to be individually modified.
Peak height velocity refers to growth spurts. It is during this time of rapid growth that young athletes are most susceptible to injury. Weakness in bones due to flexible and growing epiphyseal plates, muscle imbalances around the joints, and tight muscle-tendon units involved with fast growing bones are prevalent risk factors. Some researchers believe that the epiphyseal plates of younger children are stronger than those of adolescents.
One of the goals of plyometric training is to not only enhance the muscular system but to also improve the nervous system (Brown, 2001). Until sexual maturity is reached, the nervous system of a child is not at the same skill level as an adult. Myelination of the nerve fibers is not yet complete, therefore reaction times will be slower and coordinated movements may appear difficult. As the nervous system matures speed, balance, agility, and power improve (Baechle & Earle, 2008).
With all of this said, research indicates that resistance exercise does improve physical ability and sports performance and is encouraged as long as specific guidelines are followed. The guidelines are similar to those that adults should also adhere (Baechle & Earle, 2008):
  • Dynamic warm up
  • Static stretching after resistance training
  • Begin with light loads and increase gradually
  • Advanced multi-joint exercises can be performed using appropriate loads
  • with proper form

For plyos specifically (Baechle & Earle, 2008):
  • High intensity lower body drills such as depth jumps are contraindicated
  • due to the open epiphyseal plates.
  • Exercises should be used to improve neuromuscular coordination and anaerobic
  • skills used in sports
  • The quality of the movements form should be emphasized
  • There should be a gradual progression from simple to complex movements
  • Minimum of 2-3 days between workouts

Baechle, T. & Earle, R. (2008) Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Champaign, IL. Human Kinetics

Brown, L. (2001) Plyos or not. National Strength & Conditioning Association
Volume 23, Number 2, pages 70–72

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

We don't know squat...

Squats are arguably the most popular exercise performed. Ball, wall, deep, mini, single leg, bosu…there are so many forms that can be applied to many circumstances. For athletics the squat primarily strengthens the hips, thighs, and back, but because it is a closed chain exercise, it is also used in rehabilitation settings (Escamilla 2000). However, there should be some care used when completing a squat.

Shear and compressive forces do act on the knee during a squat. Shear is a force directed parallel to a surface and compression is a pressing or squeezing force directed axially through a body (Hall 2007). Shear forces against the tibiofemoral joint (the knee) can injure the ACL and PCL, and compression forces can damage the menisci and the articular cartilage (Escamilla 2000). In the case of a squat, the shear force is acting parallel to the tibia plateau (top of the larger shin bone) (Hall 2007). In addition, forces acting on the patellofemoral joint (where kneecap meets thigh bone) create stress (distribution of force with in a body – quantified as forces divided by the area over which the force acts, Hall 2000) on the articular cartilage of the patella and the femur (Escamilla 2000).

Low shear forces are generated between 0 and 60 degrees of knee flexion and Patellofemoral and tibiofemoral compressive and shear forces increase as the knees flex and decreas as the knees extend. For rehabilitation purposes it is recommended that squats be performed to no deeper than 50 degrees (Esamilla 2000).

Activity of the quadriceps is greatest between 80-90 degrees, peak hamstring activity is between 50 and 70 degrees, and gastrocnemius (calf) activity was greatest between 60-90 degrees of knee flexion. These findings indicate that a deeper squat, past 90-100 degrees, does not increase the benefit (Escamilla 2000).

Keep in mind that some activities do require a deep squat, but for most of us mere mortals, parallel should suffice.

Escamilla, R. (2000) Knee biomechanics of the dynamic squat exercise. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise, American College of Sports Medicine 0195-9131/01/3301-0127

Hall, S. (2007) Basic biomechanics. McGraw Hill, NY, NY.

Monday, November 15, 2010

The Jeet Kune Do Fighting Stance: Improvement Through Transfer of Training

The Jeet Kune Do Fighting Stance:
Improvement Through Transfer of Training

When Bruce Lee developed the martial art of Jeet Kune Do (JKD) he used scientific principles from biomechanics and physiology to create a hybrid fighting stance. Unlike many martial arts where the practitioner faces sideways with the strong or dominant side back, the Jeet Kune Do practitioner uses more of a square stance with the dominant side forward. To facilitate movement the heel of the back foot is slightly raised, the knees are slightly bent, and the body is slightly crouched (Tom, 2005). This particular fighting stance provides the base from which all techniques are initiated. To maintain a solid base from which to move the practitioner must have balance, strength, and power; and to progress, a plan must be implemented to develop these attributes.
To improve the physical aspects used in the JKD fighting stance, the specific adaptation to imposed demands (SAID) principle is employed. The SAID principle is based on the transfer of training concept that the body’s response to exercise and training is very specific to the type of activity, volume, and intensity placed upon it. The more specific the training is to the activity, the higher the level of performance for that specific activity will be (Wilmore, Costill & Kenney, 2008). Rhea (nd) recommends that the specifics of the activity be mimicked as closely as possible. When observed, the JKD fighting stance resembles a lunge or a split squat, therefore it makes sense to utilize exercises that enhance a lunge or split squat in various settings. Using transfer of training protocols, a plan to improve the physical aspects of the JKD fighting stance can be developed.
Over the past few years core training has permeated the strength and conditioning field as well as the rehabilitation arena. The core consists of 29 muscles or pairs of muscles that control and stabilize the lumbo pelvic-hip complex (LPHC: lumbar spine, pelvis, and hip girdle) (Akuthuota, Ferrerio, Moore & Fredricson, 2008). Although while in the JKD fighting stance power is generated by pushing off of the ground, the power is transferred for kinetic chain movement, proximal to distal, from the core. To strengthen the core, basic exercises such as bracing, quadrupeds, and side planks should be included in any exercise program. More specific exercises can be performed to address the JKD practitioner’s particular needs. For example lunging on an unstable surface or utilizing multi-planer lunges while maintaining spinal control closely mimics movement initiated from the JKD fighting stance. Moving quickly into these positions by jumping will stimulate the nervous system and help ensure automatic postural control (Akuthuota et al. 2008) and in turn a solid base.
Stability has become another catch phrase for fitness trainers and is defined as the resistance to the disruption of equilibrium (Hall, 2007). Perhaps a more definitive way to describe stability for specific activity would be dynamic balance which is the ability to control equilibrium (Hall, 2007). Dynamic balance training requires maintaining postural equilibrium during movement. Simultaneously training balance and movement makes use of a number of neurological pathways as it requires feedback for motion as well as a musculoskeletal response (Clark & Russell, 2007). Therefore, the objective of balance training is to promote balance by disturbing the equilibrium of the musculoskeletal system so that there is an increase in neuromuscular capacity and a decrease in action/reaction time (Yaggie & Campbell, 2006). Movement from the JKD fighting stance requires dynamic balance as the center of gravity (COG) is quickly shifted from one foot or leg to the other during the execution of both defensive and offensive techniques.
Although there is debate on whether or not stability training on a Both Sides Up (BOSU) balance trainer can increase strength, it does increase proprioception. Improvements in postural limits involving displacement of the COG and sway have also been associated with balance training on a BOSU (Yaggie & Campbell, 2006). Adding resistance by incorporating pushing or pulling movements can increase disruptions to the COG. Further progression can be made by integrating the use of single leg exercises, rotational movements around the three axis (anteroposterior, mediolateral, and longitudinal), and movement in all three planes of motion (sagittal, frontal, and transverse) (Clark & Russell, 2007). For the JKD practitioner, balance training can increase postural limits, improve dynamic balance, and provide a better sense of stability and base from which to initiate movement.
The benefits of strength training are numerous; for activity and performance gains in strength will provide an increase of force, power, and endurance (Wilmore et al. 2008). For improvement in a specific movement, as mentioned, Rhea (nd) states that the specifics of the activity need to be closely mimicked, therefore, for strength gains, the active muscles need to be indentified and then strengthened. Through observation and electromyography (EMG) Jonhagen, Halverson & Benoit (2009) determined that during walking and jumping lunges the quadriceps and the gastrocnemius both utilized eccentric contractions while the hamstring displayed only an isometric contraction. According to Clark and Russell (2007), during a lunge the gluteus maximus and quadriceps are the agonists, the calf muscles (gastrocnemius and soleus), and the hamstrings are the synergists, and the tibialis muscles as well as the LPHC act as stabilizers. For strength training, exercises that focus on the quadriceps, the gluteus maximus, and the calf muscles will benefit the JKD practitioner.
The obvious exercise that mimics the JKD stance is the lunge: walking, jumping, with weight, or a split squat. However, there are other compound exercises that can help strengthen the same muscles. Boudreau, Dwyer, Mattacola, Lattermann, Uhl, & McKeon (2009), using a 16-point EMG system, found that the rectus femoris and the gluteus maximus are activated to a greater degree during the performance of a single leg squat than during the performance of a lunge. The calf can be strengthened by performing standing or seated calf raises and increases in calf strength have also been reported by the addition of plantar flexion at the end of a maximal velocity leg press (Fimland, Helgerud, Gruber, Leivseth & Hoff, 2009). Although the apparent exercise to increase strength utilized in the JKD fighting stance is a lunge, other strength training exercises should also be incorporated into a training program.
While strength is the maximum force that a muscle generates, power is strength combined with the speed of movement (Wilmore et al. 2008). One of the most accepted ways to increase power is to employ plyometric training. Plyometrics are used to improve the stretch-shortening cycle to facilitate recruitment of motor units by storing energy during the eccentric phase of an exercise and utilizing it during the concentric phase. Plyometric training uses ballistic movement patterns similar to those used in athletic activities (Vissing, Brink, Lonbro, Sorenson, Overgaard, Danborg et al. 2008). Box jumps, scissor jumps, medicine ball throws, and jumping rope are all examples of plyometric training (Brown & Ferrigno, 2005) that will increase the power used in the techniques initiated from the JKD fighting stance, as well as help the practitioner return to a balanced base.
Once the exercises have been determined and implemented there needs to be a method for verifying progression. Knowledge of the JKD fighting stance allows an observer to qualitatively measure the outcome. By observing base and balance, initiated movement, and return movement, a judgment can be made as to whether or not the desired results have been achieved. Through qualitative analysis, movements can be critiqued, errors can be scrutinized, and corrections can be recommended (Hall, 2007).
Although qualitative analysis may be of more use when analyzing the JKD stance as a whole, individual movements can also be quantitatively assessed. The outcomes for core strength, balance, strength, and power can be numerically defined. To measure core strength, Akuthuota et al. (2008) lists ten exercises that include multi-plane, weight-bearing movements of the global core as well as individual muscles. Some of the recommended assessments are the prone stability test, side and pelvic bridging endurance tests, trunk curl, and multi-planer single leg squat tests. For stability, testing total sway as well as body displacement can be measured using a force platform and/or specialized software. For those with more modest means, simply keeping track of the time balanced on a BOSU for each exercise will give an indication of progress (Yaggie & Campbell, 2006). The measurement for strength training is straightforward; can the performer safely lift more now (in terms of weight, repetitions, or total volume) then at the start of the training program. A recent development in the measurement of plyometric training, particularly when balance and postural stability upon landing is critical, is time to stabilization (TTS). TTS measures how long, after the conclusion of the movement, it takes to regain base and balance (Ebben, VanderZanden, Wurm & Petushek, 2010). By the use of a force platform to measure stability, TTS provides a means to quantify the dynamic landing involved with plyometric training. Each of the individual components involved in the JKD fighting stance should be measured prior to and at the completion of the training program using quantitative analysis.
Although the movements associated with the JKD fighting stance itself are minimal, the ability to securely move in and out of the base of support is of utmost importance. The practitioner needs to be able to execute a technique and maintain or regain a strong, stable base. Using the SAID principle and closely mimicking the movements involved will help in the development of a training program. Selecting appropriate exercises that transfer specific skills for balance, strength, and power will lead to improvements in performance. Using both qualitative and quantitative analysis, the results of the training program can be assessed and adjusted for individual needs as well as further improvement.

References:

Akuthuota, V., Ferrerio, A., Moore, T. & Fredricson, M. (2008) Core stability exercise principles. Current Sports Medicine Reports. 890X/0701/39-44

Boudreau, S., Dwyer, M., Mattacola, C., Latterman, C., Uhl, T., & McKeon, J. (2009) Hip-muscle activation during the lunge, single-leg squat, and step-up-and over exercises. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 2009, 18, 91-103

Brown, L., & Ferrigno, V. (2005) Training for speed, agility, and quickness. (pp. 148, 157, 168, 177, 178) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics

Clark MA, & Russell A. (2007) Optimum performance training for the performance enhancement specialist; integrated balance training. Calabasas, CA: National Academy of Sports Medicine.

Ebben, W., VanderZanden, T., Wurm, B., & Petushek, E. (2010) Evaluating plyometric exercises using time to stabilization. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(2), 300–306

Fimland, M., Helgerud, J., Gruber, M., Leivseth, G., & Hoff, J. (2009) Functional maximal strength training induces neural transfer to single-joint tasks. European Journal of Applied Physiology. doi 10.1007/s00421-009-1096-4

Hall, S. (2007) Basic biomechanics. (pp. 44-48, 445) New York: McGraw-Hill.

Jonhagen, S., Halverson, K., & Benoit, D. (2009) Muscle activation and length changes during two lunge exercises: implications for rehabilitation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 2009: 19: 561–568

Rhea, M. (nd) Transfer of training to sport performance. Retrieved October 26, 2010 from http://academics.ashs.atsu.edu/hmvideos/rhea/HM503/transfer.wmv

Tom, T. (2005). The straight lead, the core of Bruce Lee’s Jun Fan Jeet Kune Do. (pp. 25-33) Boston: Tuttle Publishing.

Vissing, K., Brink, M., Lonbro, S., Sorenson, H., Overgaard, K., Danborg, K., et al. (2008) Muscle adaptations to plyometrics vs. resistance training in untrained young men. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 22(6), 1799–1810 2008

Wilmore, J., Costill, D., & Kenney, W. (2008) Physiology of sport and exercise. (pp. 189, 190, 195, 247-248) Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.

Yaggie, J., & Campbell, B. (2006) Effects of balance training on selected skills. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 20(2), 422-428